Final June, simply Months after the launch of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, a pair of New York Metropolis attorneys used the instrument to write down a really poor report. The AI cited false instances, inflicting an uproar, an offended choose, and two very embarrassed attorneys. It was proof that whereas bots like ChatGPT could be helpful, you actually should examine their work fastidiously, particularly in a authorized context.
The case did not escape the oldsters at LexisNexis, a authorized software program firm that gives instruments to assist attorneys discover the proper case legislation to make their authorized arguments. The corporate sees the potential for AI to assist cut back a lot of the mundane authorized work every legal professional performs, but additionally acknowledges these very actual issues because it begins its generative AI journey.
Jeff Reihl, CTO of LexisNexis, understands the worth of AI. The truth is, his firm has been incorporating expertise into his platform for a while. However having the ability to add ChatGPT-like performance to your authorized toolbox would assist attorneys work extra effectively: it could assist with brief writing and discovering citations quicker.
“We, as a corporation, have been working with synthetic intelligence applied sciences for a number of years. “I believe what’s actually totally different now since ChatGPT got here out in November is the chance to generate textual content and the conversational facets that include this expertise,” Reihl instructed TechCrunch+.